Some things my family did right. Or, at least, they did things that weren't particularly wrong that I'm able to look back to in fondness.
I particularly liked the back rubs. I think they started out as back scratches and morphed into rubs when Dad decided that scratching was inferior to rubbing because while scratching feels good over an itch, it can sometimes provoke the itch into spreading or remaining. Rubbing, while feeling less like it's fixing the itch, will slowly soothe it. So although it takes longer, and you have to be more patient, rubbing will fix the problem more thoroughly, and is therefore the superior method.
Dad made a series of such decisions, expecting them to be the Answer For All Time. But that isn't what this post is about, I'll let that short note be a reminder to post about that later. Assuming I read back through the posts, it should work.
I never told Dad, and at the time he was pontificating about rubbing vs. scratching, I might not even have been aware, but when I asked to have my back scratched, it wasn't because I had a particular itch, really.
Oh, I might have felt a prickling when I saw an adult relative sitting on a couch with space available beside them. But that would have been a prompt from my subconscious. What I wanted was the contact. And rubbing worked as well as scratching did.
In my family, in our family, any kid who sat next to an adult and laid across their lap could ask for a back rub. Not in the middle of the adults talking, necessarily. And not when Dad had a cup of coffee. But in general. It was a soothing and bonding thing.
Even if there was conversation and coffee, it might be possible to lean over and settle in. Which might possibly lead to desultory rubbing, without asking, if you were lucky. The desultory rubs were never as good as the deliberate ones, but they were better than nothing if you were in the mood.
On a more active level, Dad, and a couple of the younger uncles, used to pop our toes. Sometimes a big play would be made about trapping the bare foot of a sitting child and slowly pulling on each toe, one by one, until each joint cracked. Of course, sometimes we asked for it, too. We'd lay on the floor near a seated adult and wave a bare foot.
As we got older, we started doing it to each other. And to ourselves. We learned that tipping the joint sideways would often crack the joint with less effort. But you had to be more careful using that method, because it would hurt if you cranked down too sharply.
So, back rubs and toe popping. Two things that my family did right.
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Apologies for the delay
Sorry for the delay, but first my computer stopped talking to outside devices, like the screen and keyboard, then I had to prepare for a trip and Christmas at the same time. I'm not sure I'm doing either one well, but they'll both be done after a fashion.
We're not sure what's wrong with the computer, but it works as long as there's nothing plugged into its rear USB ports. So my USB hub and external hard drive are both unplugged.
We're not sure what's wrong with the computer, but it works as long as there's nothing plugged into its rear USB ports. So my USB hub and external hard drive are both unplugged.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Post 4.7.0.0 PORAC and Uncle B
Uncle B, my mother's older brother, was president of PORAC,
possibly twice. when I was young, I had
no trouble remember what the initials stood for. . . Until U Nicole B told me
that the way to remember the initials was to think of poor old raggedy-assed
cops. After he said it, that phrase was
the only thing I could remember. It
totally pushed the real title out of my head.
Let's see if I can guess at it now. Police Officers Research Association of
California. I'll look it up online
later, to check.
Going through the things that Mom had in boxes, I found a memorial
resolution by the California State Assembly.
I thought it would just say that he'd been president of PORAC, but it
went on a good bit. I'll put it in here,
later. I'm not at home, now, and it's in
the file cabinet.
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Post 3.1.2.0 Girl Scout Camp and Cheesecake
I wrote in another post about the aftereffects of my sister
and i going to Girl Scout Camp. This is
possibly something that happened while I was there, or it might have happened
another year, when I went, but S-2 didn't.
I suspect that it was the year that I went to the
"primitive" camp. By primitive
they meant that we had to pitch tents instead of sleeping in permanent half
tents with raised wooden floors and demi-sides. We had to dig our own latrine
instead of using the permanent toilets.
We had to rig a camp shower instead of . . . You get the idea.
Oh, and we cooked food over a campfire and prepped at a
table we lashed together ourselves. The
camp provided the twine. It was, you
know, camping instead of going to camp.
I had been camping before and was an introvert raised by hermits, so it
was right up my alley.
The other campers ate in a mess hall, with the regular
amount of Girl Scout singing before and after meals. The cooks liked us because they didn't have
to cook for us. All they had to do was
pack up boxes of food cans and boxes and packets for us to pick up. One night
there were a few big, square trays of cheesecake left over from dinner, and
they slipped them to out councilors, who were up at the main camp for
something.
It was my first experience with cheesecake. It was probably from a mix. We didn't care.
It was grub.
My Dad wouldn't let us buy cheesecake for dessert. He
proclaimed that it was too rich, in a voice that implied that therefor people
with unjaded taste buds would find it vile.
Out taste buds were definitely unjaded. We usually weren't allowed to order dessert
at all. Milk with dinner was compulsory
and soda was frowned on.
The cheesecake that night was sweet and had a nice graham
cracker bottom. I provisionally considered
that maybe it wasn't real cheesecake and that maybe it was just impossible for
a jello pudding type mix to be too rich. I'd have to test real cheesecake some
day. Meantime, I think I had five
pieces. There was enough that everyone could.
Later, after I had gone away to college, I tried real
cheesecake. I went on to try many
different types of cheesecake. I can
state definitively that I never found one that was too rich.
But that wasn't what this post was meant to talk about. It also wasn't meant to share the fact that
my father went to his grave never having tasted real maple syrup.
It was a conscience choice on his part. We always used home made syrup. I learned to make it pretty young. You put a cup of sugar in a pan. Then add a half cup of brown sugar. Pour in a cup of water and bring it to a
boil. Stir occasionally as the sugar
dissolves, then turn it off and let it cool.
When it's cool, stir in a teaspoon of vanilla and a quarter
teaspoon of maple flavoring. Put it in
the Tupperware syrup holder. Put the
extra in a small mason jar. Or in our
house, an old peanut butter jar.
That was the syrup that Dad used. Even Mrs. Butterworths was
a corporate trick to fool you into paying more money for an inferior product,
just to show off that you used store bought syrup.
Maple syrup, on the other hand, was a different sort of
trap. It was a good product, but it wasn't anything that anyone really
needed. If a person were to taste it,
and find it to be good, forever after they would remember the taste whenever
they used any kind of syrup. The home
made syrup that was sweet and tasty and economical would become that stuff that
wasn't quite maple syrup.
So he decided to never taste maple syrup, in case he should
like it. That way his regular syrup would
remain a happy treat, complete in itself.
Sorry to digress, but Dad was a pontificator and believed in
the efficacy of repeating certain lessons to impress them on young minds. Must of my memories aren't far from a memory
of Dad going on about something, and the generous pontificating is easier on
the memory than the angry ranting.
But on to the point of the post.
On some occasion, when I was at camp, I got a letter from
home. Dad was the one who wrote the
letters in our family, so it was no surprise that it was from him. It said, "I'm sitting here with pen and
paper. Your mother thinks I'm writing you a letter. She doesn't know, does
she?"
He ranted and pontificated, but he also had a sense of
humor.
Post 7.6.0.0 Take 5 things in case of zombies
Someone posted a question online. What 5 things would you grab in the case of a zombie apocalypse.
Me, I have bad knees. But then I don't get far from my van, so I'll just make that one of the things I take. In fairness, I won't stock the van for zombies, so it just has what's in it regularly. Which reminds me that I need to get my gym bag back to the van, so I'll have a towel.
Maybe I shouls also grab a bicycle in case I run out of gas. That's two.
Three would be my dog. Four might be dog food. Nah. I'm going to need a blanket or sleeping bag.
I don't have any typical anti-zombie weapons around. The closest thing I can think of is a shovel. If I get to shop around, I'd look for an old style bung tool. (That name always makes me smile.)
Bung tools are used for opening the bungs on 55 steel gallon barrels. Back in the day, bungs weren't standardized, so the bung tool was this roughly club shaped brass thing with various protrusions on the end, meant to fit different styles of bungs. I had a job once that called for me to use one fairly regularly, and I was never able to pick it up without thinking "blunt instrument." It was a hefty, nasty looking sucker.
More modern ones are streamlined and lighter. The brass is to prevent sparks against the steel, since a good number of 55 gallon drums are used to store various solvents and other flammable things. Sparks would be bad.
Heh. Bung tool.
Me, I have bad knees. But then I don't get far from my van, so I'll just make that one of the things I take. In fairness, I won't stock the van for zombies, so it just has what's in it regularly. Which reminds me that I need to get my gym bag back to the van, so I'll have a towel.
Maybe I shouls also grab a bicycle in case I run out of gas. That's two.
Three would be my dog. Four might be dog food. Nah. I'm going to need a blanket or sleeping bag.
I don't have any typical anti-zombie weapons around. The closest thing I can think of is a shovel. If I get to shop around, I'd look for an old style bung tool. (That name always makes me smile.)
Bung tools are used for opening the bungs on 55 steel gallon barrels. Back in the day, bungs weren't standardized, so the bung tool was this roughly club shaped brass thing with various protrusions on the end, meant to fit different styles of bungs. I had a job once that called for me to use one fairly regularly, and I was never able to pick it up without thinking "blunt instrument." It was a hefty, nasty looking sucker.
More modern ones are streamlined and lighter. The brass is to prevent sparks against the steel, since a good number of 55 gallon drums are used to store various solvents and other flammable things. Sparks would be bad.
Heh. Bung tool.
Post 4.7.0.0 Dad's Napkin Stack
Damn, I hate it when things pop out of my mind after less than a minute.
What was I thinking of? Something about Dad that was to go into the blog
Patchwork Riddles. Food related? (The memory popped into my head while I was
taking a hamburger out of its bag.)
Not Ichabod. Ah, yes. The stack of napkins. I've been getting cheap
hamburgers lately. Why isn't pertinent, but I don't promise not to write about
it later. What matters is that lately several different fast food outlets have
been putting wads of napkins in the bag, even with a single hamburger. And it's
wasteful to just throw them out. And it would fill up the landfill to just
throw them out. And several dead people in my life would frown on just throwing
them out. Not to mention that they might be useful at some point.
So I have a small stack of them in the car and a growing stack of them in my desk drawer. This reminds me of Dad, one of the disapproving dead people mentioned above. He didn't buy quick hamburgers while driving through to somewhere else. Oh, sometimes he would eat a hamburger or a taco if Mom went and got them and brought them home. But if he was going out for food he wanted to sit down and have someone come to the table to get his order.
While my parents lived in Willow Creek, California, they ate twice a day at
a restaurant called The Flame. I do not recall that The Flame handed out
multiple napkins. Possibly my father collected them one at a time. He was both
a very neat eater and a germophobe, so the napkin probably stayed under his
dining utensils to protect them from the non-sterile public table.*
Another possibility is that he would bring partial portions home, and they
would put a napkin into the bag with the boxed leftovers. There may also have
been napkins put in with the jimmies** that were sometimes purchased from the
deli counter at the grocery store.
However they came into his life, they would be stacked on the counter of
the kitchen island, on the outside corner to the left of the stove. They were
available for use in any situation that warranted it. Mom still bought paper
towels, and there was no nagging about using a paper towel that had to be paid
for when there was a perfectly good free napkin available. They were just
there.
I don't think the stack ever got more than three inches tall. And I seem
to remember there being different styles and colors of napkin in it. So either
they came from more than one source or The Flame liked to mix things up
napkin-wise.
There was never any stated attempt to use them from the bottom of the
stack, so the lowest napkin was probably the eldest. I wonder if it was
possible to do napkin archeology on them, peering down through the strata and
reconstructing a culinary timeline. That would be complicated, I suppose, by
the fact that he didn't just collect them, he used them too. That would add
erosion to the deposition of the stack. Hmmm.
I also wonder if they packed them and brought them along when they moved.
Monday, December 3, 2012
Post 5.4.0.0 Safety lists are a Daily Dose of Death
An unintended consequence is something
unforeseen that happens because of something you did, but which is outside of
your strict effort-to-goal plan-line. I started presenting monthy safety meetings for my section at work. Then a few other sections noticed that they hadn't had a safety meeting in a long time, and they asked if they could join ours. Soon I was presenting to more than half the floor.
Then my name got on some safety marketing lists. Now I get emailed newsletters that have hook questions like this:
For awhile, I would dutifully read these little newsletters. They were quick little warm-ups to start the day and once or twice I actually found something that my section should know about, and I'd include it in the next meeting.
But soon they started to affect my mood. I came to think of them as my daily dose of death, because there were usually one to three little articles about someone dying on the job and the safety violation that caused it. I had expected that taking on the safety meetings would be an odd amount of work that didn't exactly fit in with the other things I was doing. The unintended consequence was a darkening of my outlook.
I decided it really wasn't worth it to read the newsletters. Now I very rarely open them.
If you're curious, the answer to the quoted question is that the widow got workers' comp survivor's benefits, but only after she appealed and then appealed again to the Texas Supreme Court.
The final decision was predicated not on his driving of a company truck and not on his having been assigned to go to the conference and not because he was on his way to pick up another employee (who had also been required to go). Nope, it was because the conference was a multi-day conference, so that what the employee was doing was considered to be "overnight travel".
"Overnight travel" is not covered by the coming and going rule.
Then my name got on some safety marketing lists. Now I get emailed newsletters that have hook questions like this:
"Employee injury or death while traveling to or from work is usually not covered under workers' compensation insurance, due to the coming and going rule. But what if the employee was killed while on the way to pick up a co-worker to go to an employer-required conference?"
For awhile, I would dutifully read these little newsletters. They were quick little warm-ups to start the day and once or twice I actually found something that my section should know about, and I'd include it in the next meeting.
But soon they started to affect my mood. I came to think of them as my daily dose of death, because there were usually one to three little articles about someone dying on the job and the safety violation that caused it. I had expected that taking on the safety meetings would be an odd amount of work that didn't exactly fit in with the other things I was doing. The unintended consequence was a darkening of my outlook.
I decided it really wasn't worth it to read the newsletters. Now I very rarely open them.
If you're curious, the answer to the quoted question is that the widow got workers' comp survivor's benefits, but only after she appealed and then appealed again to the Texas Supreme Court.
The final decision was predicated not on his driving of a company truck and not on his having been assigned to go to the conference and not because he was on his way to pick up another employee (who had also been required to go). Nope, it was because the conference was a multi-day conference, so that what the employee was doing was considered to be "overnight travel".
"Overnight travel" is not covered by the coming and going rule.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)